TDThe Nigerian Army has dismissed allegations made by a former soldier, Rotimi Olamilekan, describing them as false, misleading, and aimed at misinforming the public.
This was contained in a statement signed by Colonel Appolonia Anele, Acting Director of Army Public Relations.
The military addressed the claims made during a widely circulated interview.
During the interview, Lance Corporal Olamilekan criticised troop welfare, salary structure, and access to operational equipment.
Dismissal Based on Indiscipline
The Army clarified that Olamilekan was not dismissed for expressing opinions or “speaking the truth,” but due to repeated acts of indiscipline.
These included violations of military regulations, particularly the Armed Forces Social Media Policy.
According to the statement, offences such as unauthorised media appearances, commercialisation of military identity, and dissemination of partisan content constitute serious breaches under the Armed Forces Act.
The Army emphasized that his dismissal followed due process in line with established military laws and codes of conduct.
Welfare and Remuneration Structure Explained
Addressing claims of poor remuneration, the Nigerian Army stated that it operates a structured and transparent salary system.
The system, it said, is based on rank and years of service, as outlined in the Manual of Financial Administration for Armed Forces of Nigeria.
The statement noted that personnel receive not only consolidated salaries but also multiple allowances, including uniform allowances paid directly into their accounts.
Troops deployed outside their base units are further entitled to Ration Cash Allowance, Habit Allowance, and, in some cases, free feeding arrangements.
Additionally, soldiers engaged in operations such as Operation HADIN KAI receive operational allowances and mission-specific benefits designed to support their welfare and enhance effectiveness in the field.
The Army described claims that soldiers rely solely on basic salaries as inaccurate and misleading.
Rebuttal of Equipment Claims
The military also refuted allegations that personnel are required to purchase their own uniforms and protective gear, including bulletproof vests and helmets.
It stressed that the provision of uniforms, kits, arms, and operational equipment is a core institutional responsibility handled through established logistics and ordnance systems.
According to the Army, dedicated units manage procurement, storage, and distribution to ensure troops are adequately equipped.
While acknowledging that some personnel may choose to supplement issued kits for personal comfort, the Army said such actions are voluntary and do not reflect systemic deficiencies.
“The assertion that troops operate without protective gear is false and reckless,” the statement added.
It warned that such narratives could undermine troop morale and public confidence.
Call for Public Caution and Media Responsibility
The Nigerian Army urged the public to disregard the allegations, describing them as attempts to generate sympathy and spread misinformation.
It called on citizens to avoid amplifying unverified claims, which could weaken national security efforts.
The statement also appealed to media organisations to verify sensitive information through credible and official sources before publication.
The Army reaffirmed its commitment to discipline, accountability, and personnel welfare.
It emphasized the need for continued public support for the Armed Forces, noting the sacrifices made by troops in defending the nation.
“The Nigerian Army remains steadfast in its mandate and urges the public to treat these claims with the disregard they deserve,” the statement concluded.
