THIS DAWN — A recent essay written by Peter Omonua titled “Exclusion and Ostracization: Ndigbo Should Negotiate Settlement and Craft Exit Strategy” has reignited debate over the political and economic marginalization of the Igbo people in Nigeria.
The piece contends that decades of exclusion from key national decision-making positions, coupled with systemic ostracization, have left Ndigbo with limited options.
The author calls for a pragmatic reassessment of Igbo participation in the Nigerian project, including the possibility of negotiating a settlement and crafting an exit strategy.
Historical Context of Exclusion
The essay situates Igbo exclusion within Nigeria’s post-independence history.
Following the civil war of 1967–1970, the Igbo people faced widespread devastation and were subjected to policies that curtailed their economic recovery.
Despite their resilience and entrepreneurial spirit, successive governments have allegedly sidelined them from strategic national positions.
The article notes that while other regions have enjoyed political dominance and infrastructural development, the South-East has remained underrepresented.
This exclusion is seen not merely as political oversight but as deliberate ostracization, designed to weaken Igbo influence in national affairs.
Igbo Leadership
Respecting leadership in Igbo land, the author contended that Ndigbo, at this moment, does not appear to have a leader.
He expressed deep concern that Igbo leaders of thought were “eliminated” withing a short space of time.
He wrote: “Those who had hitherto carried out the oversight role have been mysteriously and systematically eliminated between Buhari’s second term and the current Tinubu’s government.
“The manner they all died should leave no one in doubt.
“First, it was George Obiozor (Ex-President General – Ohaneze Ndigbo – who died Dec. 2022).
“Professor Ben Nwabueze (SAN), who might be said to be advanced in age but was one of the remaining pillars of the struggle for Igbo emancipation, died on October 29, 2023.
“Then Dr. Chukwuemeka Ezeife (who died Dec. 2023).
“Senator Ifeanyi Ubah passed away on Saturday, 26 July 2024; followed by Onyeka Onwenu (who died July 30, 2024).
“Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu (Ex-President General – Ohaneze Ndigbo – died Dec. 2024).
“The one other vociferous person I am afraid may be in the ‘terminator’s’ radar is Senator Enyinaya Abaribe. He needs to be protected.”
Evidence of Marginalization
The report highlights several areas where exclusion is most visible:
- Political Offices: Key national positions such as the presidency, defense, and security portfolios have consistently eluded Igbo candidates.
- Infrastructure: Federal investment in roads, ports, and energy projects in the South-East lags behind other regions.
- Economic Access: Policies around importation, customs, and trade have disproportionately disadvantaged Igbo entrepreneurs, despite their dominance in commerce.
- Security Concerns: The militarization of the South-East and the branding of legitimate political agitation as insurgency have further alienated the region.
The essay argues that these patterns are not accidental but systemic, reflecting a broader strategy of exclusion.
The Case for Negotiation
According to the article, the time has come for Igbo leaders to move beyond appeals for inclusion and instead pursue structured negotiations.
The author suggests that Ndigbo should articulate clear demands, including guarantees of political representation, economic investment, and cultural recognition.
Negotiation, the piece argues, should be approached with pragmatism. Rather than relying on emotional appeals or fragmented activism, Igbo leaders must present a united front, backed by data and historical evidence of exclusion.
The goal would be to secure either meaningful inclusion within Nigeria or a peaceful settlement that allows for self-determination.
Crafting an Exit Strategy
Perhaps the most controversial aspect of the essay is its call for an exit strategy.
The author contends that if negotiations fail, Ndigbo must be prepared to chart a course outside the Nigerian federation.
This does not necessarily mean immediate secession but rather a structured plan that outlines political, economic, and diplomatic steps toward autonomy.
Key elements of such a strategy could include:
- Economic Preparedness: Strengthening regional industries, trade networks, and financial institutions to sustain independence.
- Political Organization: Building consensus among Igbo political leaders, traditional institutions, and civil society.
- International Engagement: Seeking support from global partners to legitimize Igbo aspirations.
- Security Planning: Developing mechanisms to protect the region from external aggression or internal instability.
The essay emphasizes that an exit strategy should be carefully crafted, avoiding rash decisions while ensuring that Ndigbo are not perpetually trapped in a cycle of exclusion.
Critique of Current Igbo Leadership
The article is critical of current Igbo political leadership, accusing them of complacency and failure to confront systemic marginalization.
Many leaders, it argues, have prioritized personal gain over collective interests, thereby weakening the region’s bargaining power.
The author calls for a new generation of leaders who are willing to challenge the status quo, articulate Igbo grievances, and pursue either meaningful inclusion or a dignified exit.
National Implications
The essay warns that continued exclusion of Ndigbo poses risks not only to the South-East but to Nigeria as a whole.
Marginalization fuels resentment, undermines national unity, and creates fertile ground for unrest.
A Nigeria that systematically ostracizes one of its major ethnic groups cannot achieve stability or prosperity.
By advocating negotiation and potential exit, the article underscores the urgency of addressing Igbo grievances before they escalate into irreconcilable conflict.
Reactions and Debate
The publication has sparked debate among commentators and political observers.
Some view the call for an exit strategy as radical, arguing that Nigeria’s unity must be preserved at all costs.
Others see it as a necessary wake-up call, highlighting the depth of Igbo frustration.
Critics of the essay caution that secessionist rhetoric could inflame tensions and invite repression.
Supporters counter that ignoring Igbo grievances perpetuates injustice and risks long-term instability.
Conclusion
The essay “Exclusion and Ostracization: Ndigbo Should Negotiate Settlement and Craft Exit Strategy” presents a sobering assessment of Igbo marginalization in Nigeria.
It argues that decades of exclusion have left Ndigbo with little choice but to pursue structured negotiations and prepare for a possible exit.
While controversial, the piece reflects growing frustration within the South-East and raises critical questions about Nigeria’s future.
Whether through inclusion or separation, the fate of Ndigbo will depend on the willingness of leaders—both Igbo and national—to confront systemic exclusion and chart a path toward justice.
