THIS DAWN — The United States has issued its most confrontational National Security Strategy in decades — but its target is not only China, Russia, or hostile actors abroad. It is Europe itself.
Washington’s newly released NSS reads less like a document aimed at strengthening the transatlantic alliance and more like a diagnosis of a continent in decline.
It frames Europe as a civilisation supposedly eroding under migration, regulatory “overreach,” demographic anxiety and weakened national sovereignty.
It goes further: it calls for “cultivating resistance” within European nations, an unprecedented endorsement of nationalist politics by America’s highest strategic document.
This is not mere rhetoric. It is a political act. And Europe must treat it as such.
An Attack on the European Idea
At the core of the NSS lies a critique of the model that has defined Europe since the post-war era:
- shared sovereignty
- pluralism
- regulated capitalism
- collective security
- open societies
To Washington, these have become liabilities. The document argues that supranational institutions — a thinly veiled reference to the EU — “undermine sovereignty,” and portrays Europe’s migration and social policies as existential threats rather than democratic choices by 450 million citizens.
This is not strategic advice. It is ideological intrusion.
By framing Europe’s political trajectory as self-destructive, the U.S. is signalling a new posture: a strategic decoupling from Europe’s values, even while demanding more of Europe’s resources.
A Hollowed Transatlantic Promise
The NSS insists that Europe must “stand on its own feet” militarily — language that echoes long-standing U.S. frustration at European defence dependence. But this time, the message comes with two new twists:
1.The U.S. is re-directing its attention.
Washington wants to shift resources to the Western Hemisphere and the Indo-Pacific — meaning European security becomes a conditional, not guaranteed, priority.
2.The U.S. rejects Europe’s instincts.
On Ukraine, it questions Europe’s long-term strategy. On NATO, it hints at ending “perpetual expansion.” On EU standards and climate policy, it signals economic confrontation.
If Europe does not respond strategically, the continent may wake up to a quieter, reluctant, or selectively engaged America — an America that sees Europe as a burden rather than a partner.
A New Era of Strategic Autonomy — Ready or Not
Europe must resist the temptation to respond emotionally or defensively. The NSS is not a sign that America is abandoning Europe. It is a sign that America is changing, and Europe must do the same.
This means:
1. Defend Europe’s democratic centre
The NSS explicitly praises forces opposed to European integration. Europe must strengthen protections against foreign interference — old and new.
2. Accelerate meaningful defence integration
The age of relying on Washington’s security umbrella is fading.
European defence capability must move from aspiration to reality — with shared procurement, rapid-readiness forces and resilient industrial capacity.
3. Reinforce the EU’s identity with confidence
The European project is not a civilisational error.
It is one of the most successful experiments in peace, rights, prosperity and dignity in human history. Europe should articulate this — clearly, publicly, proudly.
4. Negotiate with the U.S. from a position of maturity
Transatlantic ties remain indispensable. But partnership cannot be synonymous with deference. Europe must approach Washington as an equal — one prepared to cooperate, disagree, and defend its interests.
Europe Must Choose: Drift or Direction
The United States has made its strategic declaration.
It is neither flattering nor gentle. It is certainly not aligned with Europe’s worldview.
But it is clarifying.
For years, Europe has debated strategic autonomy as though it were an optional accessory. The NSS removes that illusion.
The continent can no longer rely on the benevolence of history or the constancy of allies.
Europe must decide whether it will be:
- a spectator to great-power politics,
- a battleground for competing ideological projects, or
- a coherent, confident actor with its own strategic purpose.
This moment demands the third path.
Washington has delivered its verdict on Europe.
Now Europe must deliver its own — with unity, clarity, and ambition.
