Nigeria’s political elite must confront an uncomfortable truth: optics do not win elections — organisation does.
And today, the trajectory of the ADC coalition raises legitimate doubts about whether it is genuinely preparing to challenge the APC for power or merely performing opposition.
Time is not elastic. Electoral calendars are fixed. Campaign cycles are structured. Voter mobilisation requires months — often years — of systematic groundwork.
Yet the visible pace of the ADC coalition’s consolidation suggests an alarming absence of urgency. With less than a year before general elections, strategic lethargy is not just risky; it is politically fatal.
A nascent political movement cannot afford inertia at a decisive moment. Successful electoral insurgencies are built on three pillars:
- Institutional coherence
- Grassroots penetration
- Clear strategic command
Where these are absent, ambition collapses under its own weight.
Take Kaduna, Benue and Anambra States as case study. The executive leadership reportedly recognised by the national structure appears disengaged from sustained consultation and deliberate mobilisation.
Internal fissures are visible. Organisational momentum is weak. This pattern is replicated across other states, the coalition’s viability as a serious electoral contender must be questioned.
This leads to a more consequential inquiry — one that Nigeria’s political class cannot dismiss:
Was this coalition conceived as a vehicle for genuine power transfer, or as a pressure valve within a broader political choreography that ultimately preserves the status quo?
In Nigerian politics, history cautions us against naivety. Coalitions have often served as bargaining platforms rather than electoral machines.
Without disciplined coordination, state-by-state integration, voter data architecture, and credible local leadership harmonisation, what remains is merely rhetoric — and rhetoric does not secure polling units.
Let us be direct: defeating an incumbent party such as the APC requires urgency bordering on impatience. It requires:
- Immediate harmonisation of state executives
- Intensive ward-level mobilisation
- Conflict resolution mechanisms within state chapters
- Fundraising transparency and logistical planning
- A unified national message that translates locally
Absent these, the coalition risks becoming a symbolic gesture rather than a transformative force.
Nigeria’s political class must decide whether it is engaging in competitive democracy or strategic theatre. The electorate is increasingly discerning. Citizens demand not just alternative slogans but alternative structures capable of governing.
If the ADC coalition is serious about contesting power, now is the moment for visible, measurable, and coordinated action. Unity must be operational, not rhetorical. Strategy must replace speculation. Mobilisation must replace meetings.
Otherwise, the suspicion will persist — and grow — that this coalition is less a vehicle for change and more a component of the very system it claims to oppose.
In politics, intent is proven by preparation. And preparation, at this moment, appears dangerously thin.
